Block, 1/29-30 - A Modest Proposal

  • P&P
  • GUM: Today, Alexander Pope and Jonathan Swift, are regarded as the most accomplished literary artists of the early eighteenth century. During their own lifetimes; however, Pope and Swift were frequently out of harmony, with the values of the age, and both often criticized it severely.
    • Break into three groups and identify as many of his appeals as your group can
      1. logos - logic, facts, stats
      2. ethos - author's credentials, appeals to audience, moral ground
      3. pathos - anecdotes, imagery
HW: 
  1. Study your sonnet (recitation is the end of next week)
  2. Be ready to do a group share on Monday concerning Swift's use of logos, ethos, and pathos in A Modest Proposal.

Wednesday, 1/29 - The Argument (Logos, Ethos, Pathos)

"Hello! I'd like to buy an argument." "No you wouldn't."
  • P&P
  • GUM: In 1662 to answer questions about the universe King Charles II chartered a group of philosophers the Royal Society of London for the Promotion of Natural Knowledge. Among other things, it's members called for a kind of writing that was precise, exact, and not decorated with the elaborate, metaphors or odd, allusions of their predecessors.
  • Logos (logical), Ethos (ethical), and Pathos (emotional): the three types of appeals into which Aristotle divided the art of rhetoric, argument, or persuasion.
    • Logos - logical appeals
      • logic (syllogisms), facts, statistics
    • Ethos - ethical appeals
      • moments when and ways in which a writer or speaker addresses how he is qualified, moral, and charitable (i.e. has the audience's best interests in mind)  
    • Pathos - emotional appeals 
      • the use of anecdotes, figurative language, symbols, and images to appeal to an audience's emotions
    • Read Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal
      • Discuss uses of logos, ethos, pathos
      • How would you characterize this essay? What is Swift trying to accomplish with it? 
       

        Tuesday, 1/27 - Finish Intro to Restoration and the 18th Century

        King Charles II - Monarchy Restored
        • P&P
        • GUM: This long period of time in England_from 1660 to 1800_have been given several labels; the Augustan Age, the Neoclassical period, the Enlightenment, and the Age of Reason. Each of these labels apply to some characteristics of these 140 years; but none applies to all.
        • Finish Intro to the Restoration and the 18th century. 
        HW: Upload a PDF of your essay to Turnitin.com before midnight tonight.

        Unit 5: The Restoration and the 18th Century



        • Intro to the Restoration and the 18th Century
          • Texts 
            • See Brit Lit - Historical Eras/Contexts (in Notability) or get it again in Google Classroom if necessary.
          • Nails
            • What/who were the major events, figures, and ideas during the Restoration and the 18th Century?

        • John Milton
          • Texts
            • Paradise Lost - see GC
          • Nails
            • What is an epic and what are some of its characteristics?
          • Lit Terms
            • epic
            • invocation of the muse
            • in medias res
            • epic simile

        • Jonathan Swift
          • Texts
            • A Modest Proposal - see GC
          • Nails
            • How does Jonathan swift use satire in his proposal?
            • How does Swift use logos, ethos, and pathos to develop his argument?
          • Lit Terms
            • satire
            • logos (logical), ethos (ethical), and pathos (emotional)the three types of appealinto which the Greek philosopher Aristotle divided the art of rhetoricargument, or persuasion.
              • Logos logical appeals
                • logic (syllogisms), facts, statistics
              • Ethos - ethical appeals
                • moments when and ways in which a writer or speaker addresses how he is qualified, moral, and charitable (i.e. has the audience's best interests in mind)
              • Pathos - emotional appeals 
                • the use of anecdotes, figurative language, symbols, and images to appeal to an audience's emotions


        • Samuel Johnson 
        • Ryan Smith
        • Boonin-Kreeft Debate
          • Text (source) - Is Abortion Morally Justifiable in a Free Society?
          • Lit Terms
            • Premise - an assertion that supports a conclusion
            • Conclusion - the main assertion that follows from a premise or premises
            • Counterargument - an opposing viewpoint or premise
            • Refutation (to refute) - a discrediting of a counterargument
            • Concession (to concede) - an acknowledgment of the merit of a counterargument
            • Fallacy (fallacious argument)
              • see the definition and list of fallacies in GC under Unit 5 entitled "WLTC Ch. 6 - Fallacious Arguments"
              • Appeal to (dubious) Authority
                1. Snob Appeal
              • Appeal to Fear
              • Appeal to Pity
              • Begging the Question
                1. Loaded Question
                2. Question Begging Epithet (name calling)
              • Double Standard
              • Equivocation
              • False Analogy
              • False Cause (post hoc)
              • False Dilemma (either/or)
              • Hasty Generalization
              • Personal Attack (ad hominem)
                • "Tu quoque" (you also)
              • Poisoning the Well
              • Slippery Slope
              • Straw Man
              • Red Herring - introduces an irrelevant topic to lead the debate away from the real topic

        Monday, 1/23 - Intro to the Restoration and 18th Century

        Cool "Russian Doll" Pacman latte
        • P&P
        • Practice John Donne's sonnet while you wait for class to start.
        • Sign up for Turnitin.com. Here are your classes and IDs.  
          • ID 7569972 - English401
          • ID 7569984 - English403
          • ID 7569988 - English405
        • By midnight tomorrow, you must submit your final PDF to turnitin. 
        • Anyone like coffee? Coffee houses? For those of us who do, we have the Middle East and east Africa to thank, as well as England for importing this most exquisite of fruits. To get an idea about the connection between coffee houses, authors, and literature, enjoy this excerpt from William Ukers' massive tome All about Coffee, originally published in 1922: 
        The two most picturesque chapters in the history of coffee have to do with the period of the old London and Paris coffee houses of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Much of the poetry and romance of coffee centers around this time.

        "The history of coffee houses," says D'Israeli, "ere the invention of clubs, was that of the manners, the morals and the politics of a people." And so the history of the London coffee houses of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is indeed the history of the manners and customs of the English people of that period. . . .

        The Tatler and the Spectator were born in the coffee house, and probably English prose would never have received the impetus given it by the essays of Addison and Steele had it not been for coffee house associations. Pope's famous Rape of the Lock grew out of coffee-house gossip. The poem itself contains one charming passage on coffee.

        Another frequenter of the coffee houses of London, when he had the money to do so, was Daniel Defoe, whose Robinson Crusoe was the precursor of the English novel. Henry Fielding, one of the greatest of all English novelists, loved the life of the more bohemian coffee houses, and was, in fact, induced to write his first great novel, Joseph Andrews . . .

        The second half of the eighteenth century was covered by the reigns of the Georges. The coffee houses were still an important factor in London life, but were influenced somewhat by the development of gardens in which were served tea, chocolate, and other drinks, as well as coffee. At the coffee houses themselves, while coffee remained the favorite beverage, the proprietors, in the hope of increasing their patronage, began to serve wine, ale, and other liquors. This seems to have been the first step toward the decay of the coffee house.

        The coffee houses, however, continued to be the centers of intellectual life. When Samuel Johnson and David Garrick came together to London, literature was temporarily in a bad way . . .

        It was not until after Johnson had met with some success, and had established the first of his coffee-house clubs at the Turk's Head, that literature again became a fashionable profession.

        Samuel Johnson at the Turk's Head Coffee House
        This really famous literary club met at the Turk's Head from 1763 to 1783. Among the most notable members were Johnson, the arbiter of English prose; Oliver Goldsmith; Boswell, the biographer; Burke, the orator; Garrick, the actor; and Sir Joshua Reynolds, the painter. Among the later members were Gibbon, the historian; and Adam Smith, the political economist.


        Certain it is that during the sway of the English coffee house, and at least partly through its influence, England produced a better prose literature, as embodied alike in her essays, literary criticisms, and novels, than she ever had produced before.

        • Thus we embark on a historical overview of this England whose caffeine-steeped literary imagination brewed up some of the strongest satirical beverages on record. Let us begin reading and taking notes on The Restoration and the 18th Century
        HW: 
        1. (due Tues night) Your Don Satan essay must be submitted to Turnitin.com in PDF format by Tuesday night (11:59 PM).

        Class Rosters (2013-14)

        • Per 1 (Eng. 400 - Brit Lit)

          • Agudelo, Ivan  
            Barragan, Ashley Lynn
            Fortes, Kendra Nikol
            Hepburn, Takara  
            Holthouse, Sarah  
            Hu, Xinhong (Johnson)  
            Kuo, Anthony  
            Lee, Eun Soo   
            Lee, Seung Jun (Jess)  
            Lim, JaYoun  
            Manwarren, Justin Alan
            McGrath, Jack  
            Oliver, Sarina  
            Samms, Charles Dustin  
            Storrs, Morgan  
            Vanni, Nicholas Vincent
            Zhang, Meiyuan (Kelly)  
        • Prep (no class)
        • Per 3 (Eng 400 - Brit Lit)
          • Arenal, Louis  
            Bian, Yi Cheng (Eric)  
            Burdick, Andrew L.
            Falcone, Dominique  
            Garcia, Celine Ann
            Ginkel, Tristan  
            Glover, Darrien Lee
            Grossman, Corinne  
            Hober, Logan  
            Kimura, Jacob Teruo
            Lai, Chi Lok (Brian)  
            McGuire, Seamus  
            McKernan, Kevin  
            Miguel, Alexandra Nicole
            Peterson, Justin Lee
            Raney, Samuel Joseph
            Smith, Bradford  
            Taing, Aaron  
            Tital, Jayden Dominic
            Tome, Brianna Ray
            Varni, Kaley  
             
        • Per 4 (Eng 200H - World Lit)
          • Antepenko, Zachary  
            Baronia, Shelby  
            Cong, Justin  
            Dawes, Danielle  
            Ezeji-Okoye, Elijah  
            Feldbrugge, Graham  
            Fernandez, Jaime  
            Howard, Olivia  
            Jimenez, Bethany Joy  
            Labindalaua, Alexander  
            McCook, Colin  
            Mei, Ellen  
            Moran, Kayla  
            Perez, Joshua  
            Persing, Jesse  
            Poole, Hannah  
            Price, Zachary  
            Schmidt, Christian  
            Sotero, Nicole  
            Thompson, Jacob  
            Whitted, Hannah   
             
        • Advisory (Mon & Wed) 


          • Bian, Yi Cheng (Eric) 
            Chan, Ka Ying (Carey)  
            Falcone, Dominique  
            Han, Fei  
            Hu, Xinhong (Johnson)  
            Ji, Dayuan (Devon)  
            Kuo, Anthony  
            Lee, Eun Soo   
            Lee, Seung Jun (Jess)  
            Li, Kunyang (Peter)  
            Li, Xinhan (Crystal)  
            Lim, JaYoun  
            Persing, Jesse  
            Wang, Jiale (Juliana)  
            Warintrakom, Suphagorn (Ohho)  
            Zhang, Meiyuan (Kelly)  

        • Per 5 (Eng. 400 - Brit Lit)
          • Beasley, Kathryn 
            Chan, Ka Ying (Carey) 
            Fisher, Madison 
            Han, Fei 
            Hsu, Li-Hsun (Larry) 
            Hubert, David Michael
            Ji, Dayuan (Devon) 
            Ko, Chen-Yu (Richy) 
            Langdon, Taylor 
            Li, Xinhan (Crystal) 
            Pope-Williams, Taylor 
            Wang, Jiale (Juliana) 
            Warintrakom, Suphagorn (Ohho) 
            Wilson, Jillian  
            Zepeda, Franky















        • Per 6 (Classical Lit-Shakespeare)
          • Clements, Harry  
            Deoudes, Allison Nicole
            Johsens, Nainoa  
            LaMasters, Kyla  
            Mazza, Jordan Sharon
            Meck, Russell  
            Miller, Dane  
            Moore, Ashley Rose
            Moretto, Lindsey  
            Morgan, Marley  
            Raney, Rebecca Grace
            Souza, Jordan  
             
        • Per 7 (Eng 200H - World Lit)
          • Berhan, Rachael  
            Booth, Emily  
            Burbulys, Emily   
            Galindo, Maya  
            Gonzalez, Gabriella  
            Guzman, Alexa  
            Hall, Camryn  
            Henderson, Sabine  
            Johnson, Logan  
            LaBas, Jayden  
            Marshall, Brittany  
            Olson, Gwendolyn  
             

          Block, 1/23-24 - Polishin' up Yer Essay

          • P&P
          • Finish your essay by the end of the day. If you are focused, you can have the weekend to finalize everything.You will submit your essay to Turnitin.com
          HW: Finish your essay. Be ready to submit it to turnitin.com on Monday. We will not be working on it in class anymore.

            Wednesday, 1/22 - Roughin' It!

            • P&P
            • I'd like for you to have a rough draft finished by the beginning of block day.
              • Underline thesis statement
              • Underline topic sentences (TS)
              • At least two quotes for the first body paragraph (8-12 sentences)
              • At least two quotes for the second body paragraph (8-12 sentences)
            HW: (due Block) See above requirements

            Tuesday, 1/21 - Keep Goin'!

            • P&P
            • Today I want you to continue working on your Google Drive doc. (5th period, please follow the instructions regarding this in the post below.)
            • Full rough draft is due by the end of the period on Wednesday.
              • Underline your thesis statement (the last sentence of your intro paragraph)
              • Also, please underline your topic sentences (the first or second sentence of each body paragraph)
            • Plan on finishing your essay by the end of block day of this week.
            HW:
            1. (Wed) Full Rough Draft by the end of the period
            2. (Block) Final Draft by the end of the period 

            Block, 1/16 - Pluggin' away at the Essay

            • P&P
            • Continue working on your essay; here are the expected due dates:
              • a provisional outline by the end of the day. 
                • A working thesis statement
                • Three topic sentences
                • At least three quotes per body paragraph
              • Next Wednesday, bring a rough draft
              • Next block day, Final draft is due at the end of the period
            I would like you and your "pardner" to begin working through Google Drive so I can monitor your progress and provide insights to help you develop your essay. Here are the instructions:
            1. Get the Google Drive app (it's free)
            2. You must use a Gmail address (make one if your student account doesn't work)
            3. One person in the group must invite the other to the document you've created, which you will entitle "Satan and Don John: (and include your names)"
            4. Invite Mr. Reno by typing in chrisjreno@gmail.com
            5. Now we can all work on your essay together ; )

            What should I include in my intro paragraph?
            • Hook! Write something interesting about evil, suffering, or dark, lurking characters. 
            • Both authors and their works: William Shakespeare's comedy Much Ado about Nothing and John Milton's epic Paradise Lost
            • Thesis statement 

            How can we structure a thesis statement for this compare-contrast essay?

            Here are some templates for your thesis statement that you can fill in/tweak with:

            While Don John and Satan both ____________________________, they subtly differ: Don John ________________, while Satan _____________________________; this distinction shows _______ to be more profound depiction of evil than ________.


            Although both villains ____________________________, Don John __________________________, whereas Satan ______________, thus revealing ____________ as the more profound depiction of evil. 
             
            How should we structure our body paragraphs?

            Here is a chunk that I've taken from your Bedford books to help you structure your body paragraphs (The examples are a bit short for your assignment, but use them as you consider which pattern you think would best serve your purposes):

            Comparison and contrast


            To compare two subjects is to draw attention to their similarities, although the word compare also has a broader meaning that includes a consideration of differences. To contrast is to focus only on differences.


            Whether a comparison-and-contrast paragraph stresses similarities or differences, it may be patterned in one of two ways. The two subjects may be presented one at a time, block style, as in the following paragraph of contrast.



            (TS) So Grant and Lee were in complete contrast, representing two diametrically opposed elements in American life. Grant was the modern man emerging; beyond him, ready to come on the stage, was the great age of steel and machinery, of crowded cities and a restless burgeoning vitality. Lee might have ridden down from the old age of chivalry, lance in hand, silken banner fluttering over his head. Each man was the perfect champion of his cause, drawing both his strengths and weaknesses from the people he led. —Bruce Catton, “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”


            Or a paragraph may proceed point by point, treating the two subjects together, one aspect at a time. The following paragraph uses the point-by-point method to contrast the writer’s academic experiences in an American high school with those in an Irish convent.



            (TS) Strangely enough, instead of being academically inferior to my American high school, the Irish convent was superior. In my class at home, Love Story was considered pretty heavy reading, so imagine my surprise at finding Irish students who could recite passages from War and Peace. In high school we complained about having to study Romeo and Juliet in one semester, whereas in Ireland we simultaneously studied Macbeth and Dickens’s Hard Times, in addition to writing a composition a day in English class. In high school, I didn’t even begin algebra until the ninth grade, while at the convent seventh graders (or their Irish equivalent) were doing calculus and trigonometry. —Margaret Stack, student



            Wednesday, 1/14 - Don Satan

            • P&P
            • Divvy up the class into partners
            • Make a Venn diagram comparing and contrasting Satan and Don John - use quotes and your own language taken from ideas your discover in the texts.
              • You MAY NOT use the internet to get ideas. I want you to get to know the primary texts, so spend time with them. "Man on internet" will rob you of an educational opportunity. Crush any urge to spend time with him. If I do find internet overlap at all, both partners will be responsible for plagiarism.
            • You will structure your five paragraph essay in either of the following two ways:
              1. Intro
              2. Important comparisons
              3. Subtle contrasts
              4. The fundamental contrast will help you determine that either Don John or Satan is a better depiction of evil
              5. Conclusion 

              •  Satan                                      Don John

            Tuesday, 1/14 - Get Thee behind Me, Satan!

            Gustave Dore's version of Falling Angels
            • P&P
            • Check binder and six quotes
            HW: (due Wed) five quotes from PL that concern Satan and his evil nature. 

            Monday, 1/13 - Your Cinematic Paradise Is Lost

            Don John or Milton's Satan (or Keanu Reeves)?
            • P&P
            • Jump back into Milton's Paradise Lost (PL). First, we should review lit terms and the new nails.
              • Paradise Lost (lines 1-270) - Let us see if we can answer the nails and understand Milton's argument.
            HW: Continue pouring through MAN (Much Ado about Nothing) and PL (Paradise Lost) to see connections between the Satan figures.
            1. (due Tues) - I want you to have six good quotes from Much Ado that highlight the essence of Don John's evil, that concern his motives, words, thoughts, attitudes, actions, dwelling-places, victims, and arch-enemies.
            2. Update your binder: write down all nails, lit terms, and stock up on loose leaf, college ruled paper.

            Block, 1/8-9 - So Much to Do about Note Taking

            http://public.wsu.edu/~delahoyd/shakespeare/benedick.jpg
            "I will be horribly in love with her!"
            • P&P
            • Finish MAN (Much Ado about Nothing)
            • Jump back in to Milton's Paradise Lost (PL). First, we should review lit terms and write down the new nails.
            HW: Continue pouring through MAN and PL to see connections between the Satan figures. 

            Writing about Literature

            Questions to ask about literature (taken from your Bedford Handbook and adapted by yours truly)


            Questions about technique


            Plot. What central conflicts drive the plot? Are they internal (within a character) or external (between characters or between a character and a force) or both? How are conflicts resolved? Why are events revealed in a particular order? Does the plot follow chronological time, or are there shifts back and forth? Does the work begin in medias res (in the middle of things) like most epics? How and why do any subplots relate to the main plot?


            Setting. Does the setting (time and place) create an atmosphere, give an insight into a character, suggest symbolic meanings, or hint at the theme of the work?


            Character. What seems to motivate the central characters? Do any characters change significantly (dynamic vs static)? If so, what—if anything—have they learned from their experiences? How have they learned? Do sharp contrasts between characters highlight important themes?


            Point of view. Does the point of view—the perspective from which the story is narrated or the poem is spoken—affect our understanding of events? Does the narration reveal the character of the speaker, or does the speaker merely observe others? Is the narrator perhaps innocent, naive, or deceitful? Is the story told by multiple narrators?


            Theme. Does the work have an overall theme (a central insight about people or a truth about life that is unique to this work)? If so, how do details in the work illuminate this theme?


            Language. Does language—such as formal or informal, standard or dialect, prosaic or poetic, cool or passionate—reveal the character of speakers? How do metaphors, similes, and imagery contribute to the work? How do recurring images (or motifs) enrich the work and hint at its meaning? To what extent do sentence rhythms and sounds underscore the writer’s meaning?



            Questions about social context


            Historical context. What does the work reveal about the time and place in which it was written? Does the work appear to promote or undermine a philosophy that was popular in its time, such as social Darwinism in the late nineteenth century or the women’s movement in the mid-twentieth century?


            Class. How does membership in a social class affect the characters’ choices and their successes or failures? How does class affect the way characters view—or are viewed by—others? What do economic struggles reveal about power relationships in the society being depicted?


            Race and culture. Are any characters portrayed as being caught between cultures: between the culture of home and work or school, or between a traditional and an emerging culture? Are any characters engaged in a conflict with society because of their race or ethnic background? To what extent does the work celebrate a specific culture and its traditions?


            Gender. Are any characters’ choices restricted because of gender? What are the power relationships between the sexes, and do these change during the course of the work? Do any characters resist the gender roles that society has assigned to them? Do other characters choose to conform to those roles?


            Archetypes. Does a character, image, or plot fit a pattern—or archetype—that has been repeated in stories throughout history and across cultures? (For example, nearly every culture has stories about heroes, quests, redemption, and revenge.) How does an archetypal character, image, or plot line correspond to or differ from others like it?


            Wednesday, 1/8 - Much Ado about Don John

            If I can cross him any way, I bless myself every way.
            • P&P
            • Take notes concerning Don John's motives, words, thoughts, attitudes, actions, dwelling-places, victims, and arch-enemies.
            • Here is a link to all of Don John's lines. Be sure you read the entire section and some of the context to help you grasp his meaning; an ellipsis ( . . . ) denotes that there is more text than the page shows.
            HW: Please use the link above to begin collecting details that will help you note how Satanic Don John actually is. The full impact will come home when we begin Milton's Paradise Lost, when we meet the epic Satan. 

            Monday, 1/8 - The Restoration (of the school year)

            Shakespeare's prima donna
            Welcome back, all ye courtiers! I know you're chomping at the bit to begin reading the historical background for the Restoration and the 18th Century, but before we get there, we need to back up just a bit to John Milton, the last great Renaissance poet and Puritan, and then back up once more to William Shakespeare, the greatest poet . . . all to do a comparison of Milton's "Satan" in his epic Paradise Lost and the villain Don John in Shakespeare's comedy Much Ado About Nothing. So that means we dig into super heavy text for the next couple of days and then begin a sweet cinematic version of Shakespeare's comedy. Hey, it must be a comedy if Keaneu Reeves is attempting Shakespeare! "Uh, yah, Trinity, I mean, Claudio."

            So here's what we have for today's agenda:


            • Begin this segment from John Milton's Paradise Lost (lines 1-270) but read the following before beginning:

            Your job over the next week or so is as follows: observe and record similarities between Satan and Keaneu, I mean, Don John in order to prepare for a THICE. Consider the villains' motives, words, thoughts, attitudes, actions, dwelling-places, victims, and arch-enemies. We don't think you'll find many physical similarities, but you just might surprise us.

            HW: Finish copying down all nails and lit terms.